Comments on: Sandbox v1.0 (Almost there) http://www.plaintxt.org/2007/08/sandbox-10-almost-there/ Minimalism in blog design, an experiment Tue, 07 Oct 2008 13:02:55 +0000 By: adam http://www.plaintxt.org/2007/08/sandbox-10-almost-there/#comment-3066 adam Mon, 20 Aug 2007 15:26:35 +0000 http://www.plaintxt.org/2007/08/19/sandbox-10-almost-there/#comment-3066 awesome (i hadn't expanded the functions, so i'd missed them)! awesome (i hadn’t expanded the functions, so i’d missed them)!

]]> By: Scott http://www.plaintxt.org/2007/08/sandbox-10-almost-there/#comment-3065 Scott Mon, 20 Aug 2007 13:09:24 +0000 http://www.plaintxt.org/2007/08/19/sandbox-10-almost-there/#comment-3065 I was meaning to mention this on Sandbox Discuss. Yes, file a ticket and submit it. I think it's wise to use this, at least with the 0.9 branch. How 'bout those MIME type classes for attachments? I'm quite pleased with those. :) I was meaning to mention this on Sandbox Discuss. Yes, file a ticket and submit it. I think it’s wise to use this, at least with the 0.9 branch.

How ’bout those MIME type classes for attachments? I’m quite pleased with those. :)

]]> By: adam http://www.plaintxt.org/2007/08/sandbox-10-almost-there/#comment-3064 adam Mon, 20 Aug 2007 12:37:32 +0000 http://www.plaintxt.org/2007/08/19/sandbox-10-almost-there/#comment-3064 it's amazing how much lighter v1.0 is for not having all those legacy code checks. i'm working on a hooks and <code>add_actions</code> patch, that we can kick around. although for 1.0, it feels like overkill. it’s amazing how much lighter v1.0 is for not having all those legacy code checks.

i’m working on a hooks and add_actions patch, that we can kick around. although for 1.0, it feels like overkill.

]]>