<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So what&#8217;s new?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.plaintxt.org/2007/02/so-whats-new/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.plaintxt.org/2007/02/so-whats-new/</link>
	<description>Minimalism in blog design, an experiment</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
	
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob Walters</title>
		<link>http://www.plaintxt.org/2007/02/so-whats-new/#comment-2262</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Walters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 21:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plaintxt.org/2007/02/17/so-whats-new/#comment-2262</guid>
		<description>I'm trying to figure out how to insert small image logos on either end of the header title, in the veryplaintxt theme. I think this would be a very useful hack, since newspapers prefer this theme, and most newspaper covers feature these little logos on either end of the name plate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m trying to figure out how to insert small image logos on either end of the header title, in the veryplaintxt theme. I think this would be a very useful hack, since newspapers prefer this theme, and most newspaper covers feature these little logos on either end of the name plate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rana</title>
		<link>http://www.plaintxt.org/2007/02/so-whats-new/#comment-2261</link>
		<dc:creator>rana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plaintxt.org/2007/02/17/so-whats-new/#comment-2261</guid>
		<description>Scott, is there a way to enable sidebar on single pages too, like posts, pages.

I'm talking about veryplaintxt theme</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott, is there a way to enable sidebar on single pages too, like posts, pages.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m talking about veryplaintxt theme</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZiP</title>
		<link>http://www.plaintxt.org/2007/02/so-whats-new/#comment-2260</link>
		<dc:creator>ZiP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 00:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plaintxt.org/2007/02/17/so-whats-new/#comment-2260</guid>
		<description>Scott, your theme is fantastic.  And thanks for explaining how to get rid of that strong situation... i hear you on the reasons, but it seems built into WP to rewrite your own code back to strong... but it's fixed now.  Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott, your theme is fantastic.  And thanks for explaining how to get rid of that strong situation&#8230; i hear you on the reasons, but it seems built into WP to rewrite your own code back to strong&#8230; but it&#8217;s fixed now.  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a triumph for slothful indolence and lethargy &#187; Andy C</title>
		<link>http://www.plaintxt.org/2007/02/so-whats-new/#comment-2259</link>
		<dc:creator>a triumph for slothful indolence and lethargy &#187; Andy C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 17:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plaintxt.org/2007/02/17/so-whats-new/#comment-2259</guid>
		<description>[...] Life was good. And then Scott Wallick had to spoil it by announcing a major overhaul of all his brilliant WordPress themes including V3.0 of the Bartheleme theme. As the current version is an embryonic 1.2.2, you can&#8217;t resist this temptation. After months of inactivity, you now simply have to act. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Life was good. And then Scott Wallick had to spoil it by announcing a major overhaul of all his brilliant WordPress themes including V3.0 of the Bartheleme theme. As the current version is an embryonic 1.2.2, you can&#8217;t resist this temptation. After months of inactivity, you now simply have to act. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Carrington</title>
		<link>http://www.plaintxt.org/2007/02/so-whats-new/#comment-2258</link>
		<dc:creator>David Carrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 22:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plaintxt.org/2007/02/17/so-whats-new/#comment-2258</guid>
		<description>I'd really love to implement one of these over the weekend. Ideally I'd make a hybrid between the Hemingway theme and your blog.txt theme. I may be in touch again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d really love to implement one of these over the weekend. Ideally I&#8217;d make a hybrid between the Hemingway theme and your blog.txt theme. I may be in touch again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Collins</title>
		<link>http://www.plaintxt.org/2007/02/so-whats-new/#comment-2257</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 02:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plaintxt.org/2007/02/17/so-whats-new/#comment-2257</guid>
		<description>Any word on the updated Sandbox?

I'm messing with a skin and just want the updated code.  I'm well aware that the changes will be minimal, but it's been a while since the others were released.  I'm more than happy to help get it inot the appropriate state for release if you need a hand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any word on the updated Sandbox?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m messing with a skin and just want the updated code.  I&#8217;m well aware that the changes will be minimal, but it&#8217;s been a while since the others were released.  I&#8217;m more than happy to help get it inot the appropriate state for release if you need a hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.plaintxt.org/2007/02/so-whats-new/#comment-2256</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plaintxt.org/2007/02/17/so-whats-new/#comment-2256</guid>
		<description>Hi Dave: The &lt;code&gt;&#60;em&#62;&lt;/code&gt; and &lt;code&gt;&#60;strong&#62;&lt;/code&gt; elements have nothing to do with WordPress, except that it's convinced many people they equal italics and bold, respectively, by labeling them so in the WYSIWYG editor.

I can understand not wanting to go back and edit all your posts, but I'm not sure that you would. I think this issue is getting lost on most people.

To remove the styling of &lt;code&gt;&#60;em&#62;&lt;/code&gt; and &lt;code&gt;&#60;strong&#62;&lt;/code&gt;, just search the style.css file for these two elements, and then just delete those declarations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dave: The <code>&lt;em&gt;</code> and <code>&lt;strong&gt;</code> elements have nothing to do with WordPress, except that it&#8217;s convinced many people they equal italics and bold, respectively, by labeling them so in the WYSIWYG editor.</p>
<p>I can understand not wanting to go back and edit all your posts, but I&#8217;m not sure that you would. I think this issue is getting lost on most people.</p>
<p>To remove the styling of <code>&lt;em&gt;</code> and <code>&lt;strong&gt;</code>, just search the style.css file for these two elements, and then just delete those declarations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Zatz</title>
		<link>http://www.plaintxt.org/2007/02/so-whats-new/#comment-2255</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Zatz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 13:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plaintxt.org/2007/02/17/so-whats-new/#comment-2255</guid>
		<description>RE: &lt;code&gt;&#60;em&#62;&lt;/code&gt; and &lt;code&gt;&#60;strong&#62;&lt;/code&gt;

I'd really like to de-clutter my site and become standards-compliant, but I don't want to edit hundreds of previous posts to remove those default WordPress tags.

Is this something I can adjust within the CSS or elsewhere?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: <code>&lt;em&gt;</code> and <code>&lt;strong&gt;</code></p>
<p>I&#8217;d really like to de-clutter my site and become standards-compliant, but I don&#8217;t want to edit hundreds of previous posts to remove those default WordPress tags.</p>
<p>Is this something I can adjust within the CSS or elsewhere?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microformats in practice &#183; plaintxt.org</title>
		<link>http://www.plaintxt.org/2007/02/so-whats-new/#comment-2254</link>
		<dc:creator>Microformats in practice &#183; plaintxt.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 07:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plaintxt.org/2007/02/17/so-whats-new/#comment-2254</guid>
		<description>[...] One of the things I pushed out in my latest release of my themes (see previous post) is better support for various microformats. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] One of the things I pushed out in my latest release of my themes (see previous post) is better support for various microformats. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.plaintxt.org/2007/02/so-whats-new/#comment-2253</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 23:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plaintxt.org/2007/02/17/so-whats-new/#comment-2253</guid>
		<description>I just checked the &lt;a href="http://www.famfamfam.com/lab/icons/silk/" title="famfamfam" rel="nofollow"&gt;famfamfam&lt;/a&gt; Silk icons site, and those icons have a &lt;a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/" title="Creative Commons Attribution License" rel="nofollow"&gt;CC Attribution&lt;/a&gt; license. While not &lt;a href="http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html" title="GNU General Public License" rel="nofollow"&gt;GPL&lt;/a&gt;, I think the license is fine, and the attribution is explicitly in the included &lt;code&gt;readme.html&lt;/code&gt;.

But those icons are pretty good, actually. And I really like Drupal, its community, so maybe in a revision I'll include them. Thanks for pointing them out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just checked the <a href="http://www.famfamfam.com/lab/icons/silk/" title="famfamfam" rel="nofollow">famfamfam</a> Silk icons site, and those icons have a <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/" title="Creative Commons Attribution License" rel="nofollow">CC Attribution</a> license. While not <a href="http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html" title="GNU General Public License" rel="nofollow">GPL</a>, I think the license is fine, and the attribution is explicitly in the included <code>readme.html</code>.</p>
<p>But those icons are pretty good, actually. And I really like Drupal, its community, so maybe in a revision I&#8217;ll include them. Thanks for pointing them out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
